Cirtur wrote:"Take it off" would be a phrase that means nothing to Tucker's mom. Long ago she took it off, however she never has a period of time without sex long enough to put it back on again.
This astounds me, I know some people have low standards but... well I had just assumed the slutery was a joke, because who would sleep with someone they couldn't see around?*
is it just me...or is it HIGHLY pathetic that some of the people on this forum have been members* for less than a year and have more posts than all the "original" forum members** put together...how sad...your keyboard must be a very lucky girl
*nothing to do with penis
Kimra wrote:
This astounds me, I know some people have low standards but... well I had just assumed the slutery was a joke, because who would sleep with someone they couldn't see around?*
you forgot to take into account that no one on this forum would ever get a chance to sleep with someone
hawhaw said the last forum battle was funny and to check it out so i did...thats why i posted something the other day...other than that, no im not back
tucker wrote:it WAS a running joke...but im pretty sure this forum peaked out when the "tuckers mom" jokes stopped being funny
I made a tucker's mom joke in our fantasy draft today (not even half are forum goers). Something like "The Toronto Maple Leafs are going to be going up and down more than Tucker's mom."
Also, to be fair, this forum is more active than it was when you were here. It is a lot easier to have a faster growing postcount these days. We probably have at least twice the amount of regular and semi-regular posters and hence much more activity.
I guess that means the forum hasn't peaked out yet.
Hey, maybe it's some kind of prophecy. The day making fun of Tucker's mom stops being funny is the day the forum will begin to decline. It's golden age will be at an end.
DonRetrasado wrote:Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? I chose something different. I chose the impossible. I chose... Bitcoin.
