Nine-eleven was an inside job !
Moderators: GreenCrayon, Lethal Interjection, Kimra, Oldrac the Chitinous, Amerika, Cirtur, Kisai, Astrogirl, Kovvy, carbonstealer, Apocalyptus, PyroPrav, Felstaff, smiley_cow, Sahan, Euclidthegreek, Kaharz, Asherian, FengharTheNord
- GUTCHUCKER
- Gotchucker's less handsome twin
- Posts: 2126
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 2:26 am
- Location: Paradise City?
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
PSYCHIC
oooOOOOooooo
oooOOOOooooo
Datanazush wrote:I ship Mohammed and Jehova.
- Kaharz
- This Intentionally Left Blank
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 12:17 pm
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
Why bother with such an elaborate plot at all? A car bomb in times square would have probably been enough to get the public behind military action.Lethal Interjection wrote:You know what I don't understand? Why the hell does WT7 even matter? I mean, if you think this is all a conspiracy, whatever. But what would be the motivation for them blowing up another building? Do you think the planners of such an elaborate conspiracy were stupid enough to say, "Well, shit, we gotta knock building 7 down too, or else no one will care!"
What's the motivation?
Bulge, not budge. I put degrees instead of debris, but I got bulge right. The source was people on site, primarily firefighters, who witnessed it. A bulge in the wall of a building is usually a sign of imminent collapse. I've had experience of witnessing this phenomenon myself on much smaller buildings. Of course those are just eyewitnesses, the least credible form of evidence next to geocities websites with black backgrounds and yellow text in a nearly unreadable font.Thatcrazytrollguy wrote:Interesting fact I had not kept in mind: WT7 came down more than seven hours after the twin towers. So much for those who tell you that its collapse was caused by the fall of the two other buildings, or whatever vague notion of something of the like. Now you're saying that "around 2 pm" it "started to budge", what is the source of this piece of information ?
WTC 7's collapse was only caused in part by the falling debris. The collapse was directly caused by fires burning out of control for hours. Those fires are believed to have been started when the building was struck by the debris. The fire suppression system of WTC 7 was also severely compromised by damage to the building and low water pressure.
Kaharz wrote:I don't need a title. I have no avatar or tagline either. I am unique in my lack of personal identifiers.
- Jim Garrison
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:14 am
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
Kaharz wrote:
> A car bomb in times square would have probably been enough to get the public behind
> military action.
The World Trade Center was bombed a first time in 1993 but most people don't even know about it. So probably not.
Our dear professional liars have learnt how to sell a war since Vietnam. They know they have to put up a good show before we accept to swallow the loads of bullshit they have in store.
In section V of "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century" published september 2000 you can read the following sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_fo ... an_Century ). In a context of repeated calls for invading Iraq of course. And so signatories Dick Cheney, Richard Perle, Ronald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz got their wish. The power of prayer probably.
> A car bomb in times square would have probably been enough to get the public behind
> military action.
The World Trade Center was bombed a first time in 1993 but most people don't even know about it. So probably not.
Our dear professional liars have learnt how to sell a war since Vietnam. They know they have to put up a good show before we accept to swallow the loads of bullshit they have in store.
In section V of "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century" published september 2000 you can read the following sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_fo ... an_Century ). In a context of repeated calls for invading Iraq of course. And so signatories Dick Cheney, Richard Perle, Ronald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz got their wish. The power of prayer probably.
- Lethal Interjection
- Death by Elocution
- Posts: 8048
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
- Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!
- Contact:
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
I like that the most valid resource you cite is Wikipedia. Solid argument, to be sure.
- Edminster
- Tested positive for Space-AIDS
- Posts: 8832
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:53 pm
- Location: Internet
- Contact:
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
Not just Wikipedia, but an article about a defunct neoconservative think tank.
ol qwerty bastard wrote:bitcoin is backed by math, and math is intrinsically perfect and logically consistent always
gödel stop spreading fud
- Jim Garrison
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:14 am
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
If you knew how to make a good use of Wikipedia you would be aware the good articles have links to their sources, like the 14th one in this case: http://www.webcitation.org/5e3est5lT
Your journey on the discovery of knowledge might be just like tumbling down the rabbit hole !
Your journey on the discovery of knowledge might be just like tumbling down the rabbit hole !
- GUTCHUCKER
- Gotchucker's less handsome twin
- Posts: 2126
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 2:26 am
- Location: Paradise City?
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
Wikipedia is not reliable.
Wikipedia has sources,
Therefore Wikipedia's sources are reliable.
Wikipedia has sources,
Therefore Wikipedia's sources are reliable.
Datanazush wrote:I ship Mohammed and Jehova.
- Lethal Interjection
- Death by Elocution
- Posts: 8048
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:17 pm
- Location: Behind your ear. It's magic!
- Contact:
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
I didn't say Wikipedia wasn't good, just that you've set the bar pretty low.Jim Garrison wrote:If you knew how to make a good use of Wikipedia you would be aware the good articles have links to their sources, like the 14th one in this case: http://www.webcitation.org/5e3est5lT
Your journey on the discovery of knowledge might be just like tumbling down the rabbit hole !
- Jim Garrison
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 1:14 am
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
Kaharz wrote:
> The source was people on site, primarily firefighters, who witnessed it. A bulge
> in the wall of a building is usually a sign of imminent collapse. I've had experience
> of witnessing this phenomenon myself on much smaller buildings. Of course those
> are just eyewitnesses, the least credible form of evidence next to geocities websites
> with black backgrounds and yellow text in a nearly unreadable font.
And how did you collect those testimonies ? Put on a fedora and walked around with the notebook in hand, did you ? Would the much smaller buildings you mentioned be dollhouses ?
> The source was people on site, primarily firefighters, who witnessed it. A bulge
> in the wall of a building is usually a sign of imminent collapse. I've had experience
> of witnessing this phenomenon myself on much smaller buildings. Of course those
> are just eyewitnesses, the least credible form of evidence next to geocities websites
> with black backgrounds and yellow text in a nearly unreadable font.
And how did you collect those testimonies ? Put on a fedora and walked around with the notebook in hand, did you ? Would the much smaller buildings you mentioned be dollhouses ?
- GUTCHUCKER
- Gotchucker's less handsome twin
- Posts: 2126
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 2:26 am
- Location: Paradise City?
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
How did you collect your information?
Datanazush wrote:I ship Mohammed and Jehova.
- Kaharz
- This Intentionally Left Blank
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 12:17 pm
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
No, I'm not some savage or a farmer. I wore a top hat.Jim Garrison wrote:And how did you collect those testimonies ? Put on a fedora and walked around with the notebook in hand, did you ? Would the much smaller buildings you mentioned be dollhouses ?
Kaharz wrote:I don't need a title. I have no avatar or tagline either. I am unique in my lack of personal identifiers.
- Sahan
- "I promise you no penis jokes."
- Posts: 4361
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:20 am
- Location: Perth, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
An excellent choice! I'd have personally gone with a boater myself.
Destructicus wrote: Alt text:
"I wonder if chemists feel bad that they're always left out of these sorts of jokes."
Since when is chemistry not a science?
- DonRetrasado
- los más retrasadadados
- Posts: 2845
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:27 am
- Location: ¡Canadia!
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
finally, someone cuts to the heart of the matterDatPerson wrote:Your mom was an inside job!
ohhhhh
Astrogirl wrote:Lethal, nobody wants to know about your herpes.
Lethal Interjection wrote:That's good to know. I can avoid a few awkward phone calls now.
- Euclidthegreek
- Fisty McGee
- Posts: 1865
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 7:06 pm
- Location: The Mathiverse
Re: Nine-eleven was an inside job !
I'm glad someone was brave enough to return us to a serious level of discourse. I applaud you, unregistered guest.DonRetrasado wrote:finally, someone cuts to the heart of the matterDatPerson wrote:Your mom was an inside job!
ohhhhh
Edminster wrote:I'm starting to think Euclid lives in the past.